Blog

Archive for Projects

Beyond the Myths: Facts Over Fiction

Beyond the Myths: Facts Over Fiction

Dog trainers who have been working at their craft for a long time are generally very skilled in holding their tongues about the myriad of things that they hear when working with clients or even when out in dog centered locales, overhearing the general dog loving public. The source of these outdated myths are usually well-meaning family and friends trying to “help” the dog parent. But sadly, in far too many cases, the source is sometimes people actually working as “trainers”, who haven’t updated their dog behavior education in a very long time. And then of course, there is “the internet”, a source of both truth and fiction alike. I am here to bust some of those myths up with facts. Get comfortable!

Humans should eat before dogs to establish dominance:
No, just no. This came from some outdated idea that alpha wolves eat first. In reality, wolf families share meals and in times of scarcity, they make sure that the pups are fed first. In a human run household with dogs, regardless of their age, the dogs are the pups. Feeding them first will not cause them to believe that they are dominant. It will make mealtimes for the humans much more pleasant as the dogs will not be annoying the humans while they eat, as they are already satisfied. I generally recommend to my clients that they plan both meals to be ready at the same time so that they can offer the dogs their meal as they are about to sit down to their own meal. Win/win.

More on that here: Pack leadership is not a thing!

Koro is done with the myths. Can you tell?

Koro is done with the myths. Can you tell? Photo courtesy of Ariel McCray.

More dominance nonsense. Dogs like cushy places like couches and human beds because they are exactly that, cushy places. They have no illusions of control being on such cushy places except if they are resource guarding such spaces. This is not dominance related at all. It’s a behavioral issue that can be somewhat hardwired in as a survival instinct, but can successfully be worked with to improve those nerve patterns. So, if your dog resource guards raised surfaces from either the humans or other animals in your household, then get yourself a quality modern methods rewards-based behavior consultant so that you can resolve that issue the right way. In the meantime, provide plenty of soft surfaces for all dogs at floor levels. Read Sleeping with your dog has benefits!  for how it improves the relationship to have your dogs sleep with/near you. Additionally, in a similar context, you can safely sit on the floor with your dog without them thinking that you are now a sibling/toy. But do realize that many dogs are soooo excited to have their humans on the floor with them that those who have not developed great impulse control skills yet will be super excited and possibly be all over you. This does not translate to “being dominant”. This translates similarly to being on the floor with an excited toddler. Adjust your expectations accordingly.

Dogs should never walk in front of a human:
That’s silly at best. Personally, I want my dogs walking in front of me on walks, as I hate the feeling of the leash slapping at my legs. “Heeling” is an outdated concept better practiced in competition “obedience”. If you aren’t doing such, then just worry about leash manners versus heeling. Will you need your dogs to walk by your side briefly in certain contexts? Absolutely! Two examples: you have a large dog and there are others headed your way and you need to give them space; you are walking into the vet’s or the groomer’s facility, and you want to maintain control in case someone else isn’t doing so. Both of these are perfectly acceptable reasons for “heeling”. But I don’t call it that and I teach it as a “stay with me” type of scenario that a dog is lavishly rewarded for and cued for in advance of need and then released as soon as safe to do so. “Heeling” on leash on a walk is B.O.R.I.N.G. for your dog. The walk is for your dog. Let them explore their environment and check their pee-mail as well as “read the landscaping” for critter activity. This is far more mentally tiring than walking in a military style protocol by your side will ever be. Tiring your dog out mentally so that they will be more relaxed at home is your goal with walks, right? Didn’t you ever wonder why your dog returns from a “heeling” walk just as amped up as when you left? Well, now you have your answer. Read both of the following for what a quality walk consists of: Your dog needs walks for enrichment purposes  and How to mix up your dog’s walks

Humans should go out of doorways first:
Same theory though not as militantly expressed. Generally, as long as you cue your dogs to exit said doorway/vehicle opening, it’s all good. The key is the cue. Teaching your dogs some impulse control so that bad things don’t happen because of excited exits is the goal here, not some outdated theory that your dogs see you as “alpha” if you go through that doorway first. Dogs don’t think in those terms. They just think you want out more than they do. Personally, I find it easier to exit after them, as long as I am sure that the coast is clear. Obviously, exiting after them applies to doorways, not vehicles. Practicality and all.

Alpha Rolls, just don’t:
This seems to be a thing that just won’t die with some “professionals” insisting that this places you in a “dominant” position. No, it doesn’t. Wolves in the wild never did this. It was disproved decades ago. Read here: Alpha rolls are dumb . Dogs will voluntarily roll on their backs when other dogs scare them or to appear non-threatening when trying to make friends. That is a gesture that means “please don’t hurt me” or “I won’t hurt you”, the first often referred to by trainers in the know, as a tap out. Tossing a dog on his or her back with force or at all, just causes the dog to think that you are unpredictable and not to be trusted. Is that the kind of relationship that you want to forge?

Some breeds need a heavier hand:
No, not at all. All sentient beings learn by both classical and operant conditioning as well as observation. How you implement modern rewards-based methods will differ with each individual dog. But all dogs can be trained/have their behavior modified without a “heavy hand”. Read these for more on this subject: No breed needs a firmer hand  and Each dog (not breed) is an individual  and also  Positive training works on all dogs  .

Pack hierarchy is a thing:
Don’t allow anyone to tell you to reinforce a mythical status of one of the dogs in your household. You are the parent in this equation. None of the dogs are “in charge”. The humans set boundaries and enforce safety protocols. The dogs don’t decide who does what, any more than you would allow your children to decide “status” in your home. Be a benevolent parent. Fairness is important, as is making sure that all dogs know that the adult humans in the home are the ones who provide safety. Read more on that here You do not have a pack!  and here Dogs notice fairness and here  How to effectively parent your crew!

Now go forth and educate your fellow dog parents who might be listening to the wrong crowd please. Their dogs will forever thank you for busting those myths!

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (1) →

Peas Are Bullshit!

Peas Are Bullshit!

There are some subjects in the dog world that cause my brain to start twirling on it’s imaginary axis, threatening to send it into orbit right through my skull. Insisting on feeding a dog a vegan diet because of your *own* preferences (versus an actual allergy!) is one such subject. Dogs are carnivores. Many of you are wondering why that even has to be stated here. Of course, you are. Because common sense says that we should understand that fact without question. Look at their teeth. They clearly are designed to eat meat. Now before you start sputtering, note that I did not state that dogs are obligate carnivores like cats. Obligate carnivores will die without the nutrients only found in meat. Dogs can survive on other foods besides meats but that doesn’t mean that is their meal of choice. That trait doesn’t make them omnivores. We humans are omnivores. Being able to process vegetable matter, etc. doesn’t mean that their systems are designed for it nor would they ever choose it. Willingness to eat something has nothing to do with what they are designed to eat.  I am VERY willing to eat hot cheese puffs. I am pretty comfortable that I gain no nutritional value from that food choice, however. Many humans left to their own devices without input from health experts, will certainly choose food that is not appropriate for them. Heck, some dogs think that socks and other dog’s poop is a fine tasty treat. But that doesn’t make it healthy for them to exist on. Same with hot cheese puffs.

The ability to eat fruits and vegetables and grains does not mean the system was designed to exist on such. Sure, you can *add* nutrients to “make” the food balanced enough to exist on. But is that really the ethical choice for your dog? Having to add things to the diet you have chosen for your dog because the foods do not naturally contain the nutrients that they need in order to exist? Here’s a thought: offer your dog the choice between a plate of freshly cooked meat and freshly cooked vegetables and I guarantee you that I will win all-of-the-bets on which one they choose.  Yet too many people try and impose their own moral compass on dogs, by forcing them to exist on a vegetarian or even a vegan diet. That’s just plain cruel. Please, if you must have a pet who eats a plant-based diet, then forgo having dogs and cats and get a pet designed to exist and enjoy a plant-based diet. Just because you can do something without killing your dog doesn’t mean you should do it. Respect dogs for who they are. They beg of you.

Dogs like meat, not peas.

Dogs like meat, not peas.

Read more from dog nutrition experts on this subject here and here and here . Just say no to peas. Here is a fine t-shirt based on the graphic for this article by the wonderful Lili Chin, that your dog would appreciate if he or she could read. Peas Are Bullshit

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (0) →

Up Close & Personal: Why Too Much Togetherness Can Lead to Conflicts

Up Close & Personal: Why Too Much Togetherness Can Lead to Conflicts

As all of us humans are now adjusting to a new normal, so are the animals that we share our daily lives with. Some of those adjustments may be unpleasant, as many families are now spending far more time with one another than their previous routines allowed. While to many, this can be a welcome change. But to others, this can cause more/new conflicts with the human part of the equation so it comes as no surprise to some that it can also cause conflicts between our animals as well. If you are seeing your dogs becoming less tolerant of behaviors that they may have previously dismissed in the other canines in your home, then you are seeing the results of too much up close and personal time. Trigger stacking takes many forms. Read more about trigger stacking here and here . We can easily get on the nerves of those who love us the most when forced to spend more time together than we are used to. Add that to the lack of our usual sanity saving recreational activities and you have a situation rife for bickering. Fortunately, it’s a lot easier to set your dogs up for success than it is to do the same for the humans in your home.

If your household consists of dogs who get along better overall because they are separated when you are not home, then you are possibly now finding the extra time together has created more tensions between them. The same can be said of humans who live together so this is not abnormal. If you are working from home, it’s not a bad thing to continue the separation arrangements that would exist if you were leaving for your workplace, if that is an option. But perhaps the room where you are currently working from home is the room that one or more dogs would have to themselves while you are gone? Well, yes, you can still use that room for those dogs but I would also suggest that you alternate which dog(s) are in that room with you if possible. Say for example, you are working on your laptop in your kitchen and two dogs usually have the run of downstairs and one is usually upstairs (or *your* variation on this arrangement). Then switch them out at lunchtime. Make sure that the dog(s) that are not with you have some enrichment noise such as a soothing station on the radio or TV. This is something that should be happening when home alone anyway. Additionally, make sure that all dogs have some sort of enrichment activity as well, such as a snuffle mat, Kongs, etc. Obviously take into account whether there are any resource guarding issues in place when you create this arrangement. You know your own individual dog’s need best. I am only providing some guidelines to pull from. If there are resource guarding issues between any dogs in your home, that is beyond the scope of this article. A resource guarding situation needs professional intervention so reach out to your favorite modern dog friendly methods trainer or behavior consultant. Most of us are offering video consultations at this time so honestly, it doesn’t even matter where you are located.

If for some reason, the above suggestions are not an option, then you can get creative with some barriers such as x-pens and baby gates so that you can still work, but not have to be so on top of interactions that your work is suffering. Out of your home enrichment can also set the stage for a longer fuse in any dog. Walks are still permitted in most quarantined areas. The lack of commute can give you the time to get these enriching walks in before sitting down to do your work. Sniffing is the best outdoor enrichment activity for any dog and it’s free! Let your dogs sniff to their heart’s content or at least within the perimeters of your allowable time frame. Read more about that here . Distance covered during a walk matters far less than sniffing time frames. The more brain enrichment a dog has, the more tolerant they will be about perceived and real annoyances. A pandemic is never a good thing but the fact that it’s happening when we have more daylight to utilize is super helpful to both the sanity of the humans and the sanity of the dogs existing with those humans. Use that daylight for extra sniffing walks after your work day is done. Drive your dogs somewhere quieter to walk if your neighborhood has seen a heavy increase in foot traffic due to quarantine mandates that cause walks to be stressful rather than stress relieving. Cemeteries are often dog friendly. Read more about that here .

20210301_PandemicblogphotoGeorgiaCrumIf you are not working from home or at all right now, then it’s more complicated because you are likely more than a little stressed. In one capacity, that makes you an essential worker worried about your health while doing your job. In another capacity, that makes you rightly stressed about finances. Either stress will be conveyed to your dogs. I cannot help you with your own stress levels unfortunately but I can say from personal experience as well as a vast amount of dog behavior knowledge, that the more you focus on what you *can* control in order to decrease your stress level, the more that your dogs will take their cues from you. Less stress exhibited outwardly by the human means less stress taken on by the dogs. Focusing on helping your dogs navigate this new world will help you all. Spend some daily time practicing behavior cues with your dogs, both one on one and together, if that would not cause a squabble. Allow all of the dogs in your home some alone time. The ability to walk away and relax or think, without any outside interference is a priceless gift. Know your own dog’s needs. Some dogs are introverts and some dogs are extroverts. And most are somewhere between the two. Learn more about displacement gestures here  so that you can better recognize when a dog needs some room or a break from being up close and personal.

All of these suggestions are written from the perspective that these squabbles that you are now experiencing with your crew are *new* situations that have surfaced during the quarantine. Pre-existing issues are deeper seated and need a professional one on one to help you unravel the layers. If this is the case, please do consult a professional with experience with multiple dog households who also uses modern dog friendly methods. Punishment will make things worse. If you need help finding someone in your area (or even anywhere), please contact me. I would be happy to help you find someone. If it’s appropriate, I am offering video sessions as well. More on that below as well as contact info for either option. You can also comment in the comments under this article and I will get that eventually (it seems to be up to WordPress when that happens, sorry!).

Despite the fact that this is a scary new world for all of us, many of us now have the time and opportunity to recreate our relationships for the better now. And that opportunity is priceless. Take advantage of it if this applies to you. If you are one of the essential workers who never stopped working during this crisis, you have my utmost gratitude and respect. Thank you and stay safe everyone. We *will* get through this.

If you are interested in a virtual Zoom session, feel free to contact me directly at Debby@pawsitivereactions.com or view my website .

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (4) →

The Ethical Pet Professionals: Pandemic Pet Protocols

Photo courtesy of Marcy Fenell

Photo courtesy of Marcy Fenell

This has been brewing in me all month long and I don’t know why I haven’t gone this route sooner, except to say that I truly believed that the authorities entrusted with enforcing the governor of Pennsylvania’s mandate, would actually do their job. After all, other states are stepping up to ensure that their citizens are safe from poor decisions, both personally as well as professionally. Unfortunately that has not been the case here in Pennsylvania. So while the ethical members of the pet profession in my home state (and some other states under the same mandate) have been shut down completely or mostly depending on their individual offerings, others are both blatantly or quietly violating the shutdown orders. In the state of Pennsylvania, in late March, the governor changed the orders from essential businesses being permitted to remain open, to life sustaining businesses only remaining open. The pet businesses that are currently considered life sustaining are veterinary offices and pet supply stores. That’s really pretty much it outside of some minor exceptions. Most pet supply stores, aside from large box stores, are offering curb service only, as it should be. Veterinary offices chose to advise clients to stick to necessary visits only, decreasing the exposure overall. They also implemented the policy that techs will come outside to cars to bring the pets inside, sans owner.  This is another very responsible decision in the face of a dangerous pandemic.

Facilities that typically offer multiple services, such as day care, boarding, training, grooming, pet supply sales, etc., were provided with a waiver that stipulated that some of these services such as day care and boarding were only permitted to be maintained/offered for front line workers. All other services should suspend immediately, outside of supply sales for those who offer such. But that’s not what is happening. They are either seriously misunderstanding their exceptions or they are willfully violating their exceptions. In some cases, it’s the former, in most cases, it’s the latter. And that’s both sad and frustrating to the rest of us.

Most ethical pet professionals called the governor’s hotline to get clarification on what is and isn’t allowable. With my own profession being training and behavior, I verified that portion first. Training is only permitted right now via virtual sessions. No outside sessions, no group sessions inside or outside, no in-home sessions, no having a client come to your facility and no board and train in your home or facility. I have spent hours on the phone multiple times to be sure that I had the mandate allowances correct. Since doing that, I have seen multiple trainers publicly violating the mandate, offering in-home services, as well as in facility appointments and taking in board and train dogs.

Next came verifying dog walkers and pet sitter allowances. This is not my forte but many of my friends are in this category and we are working together to get through this. We were all told that those services are also not permitted at all except when performed for front line workers, with one minor very distinct exception: if the client were able to bring the dog out to the street to hand over to the dog walker, then said dog walker is permitted to walk a dog belonging to someone other than a front line worker. The one thing that the health department jumped in to state specifically without being asked was that no group walks are permitted as well as dog parks not being permitted to be open. Just 2 says ago I was sent a picture of a dog walker walking 6 dogs in the city, while scrolling through his phone. Potential clients tell me that dog parks are still open.

Next came groomers as again, many groomer friends are also being ethical and wanting to make sure that they are following the guidelines. We were all told that groomers are only permitted to work on dogs in boarding of said facility that has a groomer on staff. So again, front line worker’s dogs only. No grooming outside dogs at all. This is the category that seems to be getting the most abuse and groomers are rightly upset and concerned. Other pet professionals such as trainers and pet sitters are now suddenly offering grooming services, ranging from nail trims to actual grooming washes and cuts. Some in their facilities and some in their own homes. Crossing professional boundaries is not only inappropriate and unethical, at the moment, it’s also illegal and a potential cross contamination situation. Professional licensed groomers are well trained. Would you ask your nail technician to cut your hair? Then why would you expect your pet sitter to groom your dog correctly?

What this has resulted in is an angry public directing their ire at those of us who are following the letter of the law, both because we don’t want the fines involved with violations but because we are using our critical thinking skills. If a contact tracing comes back to the pet industry, what do you think that will do to us as a profession? A billion dollar industry is already not taken seriously. We didn’t even warrant a category in the governor’s business listing. Therein lies the problem with enforcement. It doesn’t matter what we convey to the police in charge of enforcing the mandate, the fact that this information is not in writing makes the ethical members of our profession look like Karen the complainer, instead of the real professionals that we are.

Most of the violators have been reported to the state authorities by a group of concerned pet professionals. I know that in some cases, these businesses received a warning phone call. In other cases, nada. Some are using as their excuse, that an allowable activity is leaving your home to care for someone’s pet. That part of the mandate however, is for citizens, not businesses. And in many cases, the animal is the one leaving their home for another person’s home or place of business.

This kind of self-entitlement and disregard for rules affects all of us, both in the pet business as professionals but also as private citizens. When people choose to exempt themselves from well needed safety precautions, we can all suffer the consequences. So many people are asymptomatic of this dangerous virus yet still out there spreading their germs. Contact spread can certainly include from the coats of dogs who are handled by those outside of their home.

I realize that many of us are struggling, but the thing is, is that we ALL are struggling at the same time. No one person or business has the right to act more self entitled than anyone else. Some of us will be able to safely open sooner than others. We all have to accept that this truly beyond our control. This is a new world that only the responsible among us will be most equipped to stay safe and to keep our clients and customers safe.  Groomers will likely be deemed the first to safely open as by the very nature of their business, they are eliminating the threat by washing the animal they are grooming, while safely wearing gloves and masks. They can easily do their job without interacting with another human. Doggy day cares, by virtue of what they do, the most dangerous place for cross contamination right now. Same with boarding. The need for dog walking and pet sitting has been vastly reduced due to most people working from home. But those who are are servicing front line worker’s pets are in danger, no matter how much PPE they use, unless they go home in between clients and change. And that is unrealistic at best. Trainers have it a bit easier than everyone but groomers. We don’t usually handle our clients dogs much anyway. At least of us who use science based methods don’t. We train the humans, not the dogs. But those of us who work with stranger danger dogs regularly aren’t going to be able to resume that part of our business anytime soon as adding a mask to that equation isn’t going to be helpful to the dogs we are trying to help. I do believe that we will be able to safely resume outdoor sessions sometime soon, with appropriate safety precautions in place. But it remains to be seen what else we can resume. I personally will rely on science and the medical community, not the federal government’s fast tracking. As science based trainers and behavior consultants, I think that is the only responsible choice.

This quote was brought to my attention as very applicable to this situation. I wish that I could say that it was quoted from a well known philosopher of words. But alas, it’s from a TV show that I have never even heard of. That doesn’t make the quote any less profound so I share it here. “There are those that follow the rules without exception. There are those that break the rules to help others. There are those that break the rules to help themselves.” In this case, we have to look at the why. Sadly, the whys in the pandemic rule breaking are all helping themselves. Knowing this, choose your alliances wisely. (Quote from Precinct 19, Dr. Ben Warren to Robert Sullivan)

In conclusion, as a community of professionals who are proud of our high standards, the ethical members of the pet care profession urge you to seek out the highest standards when engaging one of us to assist with your beloved pets. Only then can you be assured that your pet will truly be treated as well as they should be. Make your pet care dollars count in the future. When pet businesses are permitted to reopen, choose the ethical ones who followed the rules. Stay safe and we will be here to assist you when it is safer to do so. Thanks for waiting for us. We appreciate it.

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (0) →

The Bait & Switch: How to Better Choose a Dog Trainer/Behavior Consultant

The Bait & Switch: How to Better Choose a Dog Trainer/Behavior Consultant

What Really Matters Besides Quality of Knowledge and Experience? Read on for that. (Above photo courtesy of Dawn Goehring)

A while back, I came across a share on Facebook about choosing a dog trainer that gave me some serious pause. While some of the titles sounded quite reasonable, the explanations below those titles were at best, disturbing. So I would like to address each of the suggestions here with some real facts. Before I do that, I want to reiterate that sadly, there is still no regulation in this industry. I have written extensively on this subject, as anyone who follows my writings knows.

Mutual engagement while training is a good thing! Photo courtesy of Dawn Goehring.

Mutual engagement while training is a good thing! Photo courtesy of Dawn Goehring.

The most detailed article that explains various schools and credentials and trade organizations as well as red flag words and phrases is here for your perusal, False Positive . I strongly suggest that you start there before reading further. There was a comment on the original post that concerned me, about the “uncredentialed” trainers sometimes possessing the most experience and expertise. That can actually be true to a certain extent but quite frankly, those “uncredentialed” trainers often possess a graduate degree of some sort in animal behavior that makes spending the extra money on trade organization certifications not at all worthwhile. The note in the original post about “developing their own methods” is a dangerous precedent. Science backs the method or it doesn’t. We don’t get to make up methods and call them valid. There are many ways to implement already existing science backed methods. Varying from the actual science means not believing in it. That’s not quality, that’s quackery. Know the difference.

      1. They welcome questions. Yes, in fact they do. That much is true. You should always feel comfortable asking your trainer questions. Clarity and understanding is important. I agree with this requirement very much.
      2. They have well-trained dogs of their own. To a certain extent, yes, of course. But you are not going to meet their dogs anyway so it’s a moot point. The only way that you may meet a trainer’s dog is *if* they have a great teacher dog who helps shy dogs learn to feel safe or dogs with poor social skills to learn better ones and that is your dog’s issue. But that is not going to happen at the first session anyway. And just a note, it’s not a fault of the trainer if they don’t currently have such a dog. Such dogs are born, not made. I had one for 13 years and I miss this dog every single day. You don’t come across such a teacher dog easily. So, don’t judge a trainer who is currently without such a dog. We are not adding dogs to our lives to satisfy others. We add dogs to our lives responsibly, when it’s an appropriate time for us and our other canine family members.
      3. A relationship to aspire to. Photo courtesy of Jen Walker.

        A relationship to aspire to. Photo courtesy of Jen Walker.

        They train with methods that they developed. Nope, nope and nope again. As already addressed in an earlier blurb, science is science. There is an abundance of ways to implement modern methodologies. And it’s not a bad thing to see existing methods with a fresh eye and tweak them for use with individual dogs. We all do that all the time. But making stuff up and calling it a method does not a valid method make. There are few new things in dog training and behavior modification. Most are twists of already existing protocols. BAT is different but it’s a method that dogs already did on their own. Grisha Stewart simply fine tuned it and adapted it for assistance on the part of the humans who help worried dogs. There are other examples as well such as Leslie McDevitt’s work. But again, a twist on existing methods. And unless you can entice a famous trainer who travels around the globe regularly, to work directly with you, it behooves you to hire someone well qualified in all implementations of modern dog friendly methodology instead of expecting each trainer to reinvent the wheel. What you should learn to look for is the level of expertise in implementation. Not inventing new things.

      4. They see you and your dog as an individual. Sounds great, right? It absolutely should be this way. However, in the original post, there is a suggestion that a trainer should not give a client a step by step plan. What? Isn’t that the point of hiring a trainer? To get a step by step plan that can be followed. I know that’s what MY clients expect. And rightly so. Of course, that plan can and does take into account their dog’s individual manifestation of the issues, the human’s ability to carry out the plan, the environment of the individual client and dog, the management of the plan and a whole host of other things. The plan can and should be tweaked at any time, based on progress or not, or any changes that affect the plan. Having a plan is a good thing! Never disregard a quality trainer who has a solid plan for your dog’s issue.
      5. They have a high client retention rate. Now here we have an idea that I can wholeheartedly get behind! Yes, indeed. Quality trainers have clients who come back with subsequent dogs or even the same dog when a new issue arises. Those long-time clients refer their friends, relatives and colleagues as well. This is definitely an important trait to consider. But also keep in mind that punishment based traditional/balanced trainers also have these kinds of clients. It’s better to choose a trainer whose methodology, expertise and experience you feel comfortable with and *then* see about this part of the equation. Satisfaction with previous experience does not mean that the trainer will be your definition of nice to your dog. And quite frankly, everyone’s definition of nice to their dog should include no hitting, no stringing up on a leash, no leash corrections, no prong collars, no choke chains, no shock collars, no bonkers, no hissing, no poking, no yelling, no scaring, no nothing that is frightening or painful to the dog. Period. No exceptions. The message here is to do your due diligence when hiring a trainer, just like you would or should when choosing any quality professional who you are paying for their education and knowledge. Choose kindness for your dog. You both deserve it.

 

 

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (0) →

Proficiency Error: Do Your Research When Choosing a Professional

Proficiency Error: Do Your Research When Choosing a Professional

As anyone who follows my writing on any venue knows, I strive to see regulation in the field of dog behavior professionals in my lifetime. Not only with the goal of seeing the use of modern science supported methods being the gold standard requirement for all professionals, but to also require a minimum level of dog behavior knowledge in those offering their services to the unsuspecting public. Until then, we self regulate. Sometimes badly, because not everyone believes that we professionals should stick within our own knowledge perimeters. Even beyond that, some people go into this business seemingly with the belief that as long as they are using modern dog friendly methods, then they can help a situation be made better even if they don’t possess the knowledge at the level that is needed for the situation. This is a dangerous thought process, at best. It behooves those of who are entrusted with the care of someone’s beloved family member’s behavior issues to make sure that we possess the knowledge needed to help instead of cause further harm. It not only hurts those who we want to help if we proceed without that as a moral base, it also harms the field of positive training as a whole. A failure of someone’s individual knowledge is not a failure of the method itself, but that is how it often appears to others outside of the situation. If you are a dog training/behavior professional, I implore you to stay within your knowledge lane. Certainly please do strive to always learn more on the subjects that you want to be within your knowledge base. But until then, it’s not a failure to refer to another more knowledgeable professional when you are unsure of how to approach a serious multiple dog household conflict (or any behavior issue for that matter). It is a moral success. You can learn but you should not learn at someone else’s expense.

 

I recently observed someone already working as a behavior professional ask a question in an aggression group for trainers, how to fix an issue in a multiple dog household. Not a question about *part* of the protocol but a question asking for an *entire* protocol for that issue. The issue was a common one in a multiple dog household so needless to say, I was very concerned for the multiple dog household in question. This is a prime example of someone who should have referred this case to another professional who was more qualified to help the client. Not only is this household in more peril than they were before they hired someone but the entire profession of modern methodology dog behavior professionals is at risk when something like this happens. Please do everyone a favor and refer to a more experienced colleague if you have no idea of what even your first steps would be, when presented with an issue. This also applies to single dog homes but it’s an even more dangerous for everyone proposition when someone unqualified takes on aggression issues of any kind in a multiple dog household. There are obviously more individuals to be placed in harms way in this scenario.

 

Multiple dog household issues are often complicated, with each dog having a behavior or two that needs addressed. Rarely are they exactly as described in the intake prior to meeting with a client. I have more often than not been told that “Fluffy” is the cause of the conflict, only to arrive and see that “Spot” has been quietly been calling “Fluffy” on and no one had seen it. They just saw “Fluffy” finally say enough. Keen observation skills are a necessity along with a seriously stellar knowledge of dog body language and micro facial expressions. Furthermore, anyone trying to solve multiple dog household conflicts with “obedience” cues is someone you should pass on. This is about behavior modification, not “obedience” (oh, how I hate that word anyway!). The dogs in question need to learn how to make better choices in most cases and for the humans to provide safety, both emotional and physical. It is NEVER going to be about “obedience” or what I prefer to call manners. Teaching certain manners as a baseline offering often plays a part in a solution. But it is a minor part in most cases. The bigger issue is understanding who is saying what to whom when that communication is a silent one to most humans. In addition to  teaching the humans how to effectively moderate different personalities within the household, of course.

 

The moral of this story is that you should ask many questions of anyone who you are considering hiring for your multiple dog household issue. Ask about methodology first and once you determine that said person uses modern methods, find out what certifications they possess as well as what experience they have with both aggression and multiple dog households. If you are not comfortable with what you are being told or if you are having trouble finding someone in your area, email me with your zip code and your primary issues and I will scour the listings and my professional groups for someone I am comfortable referring to. I know what to look for. Even then I may email/message them to ask my own questions. Only then will I refer you to them. Please don’t settle for positive but unskilled. You and your dogs deserve positive AND skilled. Your dogs deserve the best help that you can find for them.

For a basic understanding of what to look for in trainers, read here.

 

 

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (0) →

Too Bad! Why I Use Time Outs

Photo courtesy of Denise O'Moore

Photo courtesy of Denise O’Moore

There are a few topics in the dog training world that can rouse people’s cortisol levels to an extraordinary level. Time outs are one of those topics. There was a video making the rounds a while back about time outs for kids being “bad”, being widely shared by some trainers as “proof” that we should not implement these for dogs either “because they can damage the psyche”. The problem with that train of thought is that the video wasn’t talking about appropriately implemented time outs (for either species!). I don’t have children so I will not be offering any opinions on the child care part of this equation. But I will happily explain how time outs can assist quite nicely with dog behavior modification efforts with zero fall out with *appropriate* use. But before I do so, I would also like to briefly mention a lovely article about the top 10 behaviors of expert animal trainers. One mention was minimizing the use of a time out. I quite agree with that but I also want to note that this lovely article was written primarily about *wild* animal trainers.  The relationship between the wild animal and the trainer is very different from your relationship with the dog that you live with. So while minimizing the use of time outs should certainly be the goal, equating the use of a Time Out with a dog in certain situations with the use of such with wild animals is not an equal comparison. Now that I have hopefully prevented this article being tossed at me as proof of how horrible I am, let’s move on.

Let’s define appropriate usage. With my own clients, there are many situations that may warrant time out usage. But each implementation is individual to the situation. There is no one size fits all and sometimes with each situation, judgment calls need made by the human part of the equation to determine what is best each time. My definition of a time out is a withdrawal of attention and/or privileges. The privilege that is lost may be the ability to move around freely (and wreak havoc!) or it may be just not engaging with a favorite human for a brief (30 seconds to 2 minutes!) moment in time. A time out is NEVER suggested for a dog that would feel traumatized by either of these things. Such a dog wouldn’t need a time out so it’s a moot point at best. The dogs that need a time out are typically adolescents testing boundaries or adult dogs who were never taught impulse control as a puppy. Or even canine bullies (the action, not the breed) in a multiple dog household.

One of my frequent usages is with puppies who are quite literally, running amok. They are lacking in impulse control and their inappropriate choices have been inadvertently reinforced by negative attention (no, stop, don’t do that, push away, etc.). What happens when you reinforce a behavior, even with negative attention? The behavior is maintained or even increased. Yep, you created a monster. The puppy has discovered the battleground game and is having a great time with this. The owners, not so much. They are exhausted and need a way to teach consequences for the puppy’s actions without hurting or scaring the puppy.

This also applies to older dogs that were never taught these consequences to their choices as puppies. The puppy/dog wears a lightweight leash and there are also lightweight leashes placed around various pieces of sturdy furniture so that the owner needn’t walk more than 5 or 6’ to implement a time out. Taking too long to provide a consequence means that you lose the message. The time frame between the verbal marking of the moment of the poor choice with the time out word or phrase to the actual time out, should be mere seconds.

Of course, time outs are not limited to tethering. Some issues are better addressed by walking away or walking into the nearest room that has a door, such as a powder room or even behind a gate (typically you, not the dog, except puppies!) But again, timing is everything. The time out word marks the moment, just as a yes or a clicker or even a good boy/girl marks the moment of an appropriate choice. And we know that the reward must immediately follow the marker in order to be effective, right? Same theory applies here. The consequence must immediately follow the marker. My time out marker is said in a sing song voice (Too Bad!) for all the world sounding like “you screwed up”. There should never be anger in a time out marker.

If attention is the intent, withdrawing said attention is a need. Even turning your back to a dog who is inappropriately attempting attention seeking is a time out. Would you call a dog traumatized because you turned your back briefly? Exactly. Often turning away isn’t enough of a withdrawal of attention for many dogs. Hence, we have the option to exit the room/situation.

Now I know that many trainers will say to teach the puppy/dog in question what to do instead of what they are doing that causes annoyance. Of course, that is also happening. Or it certainly should be. But that is simply not enough in many cases, especially where the poor choices have resulted in so much attention that it’s pretty much game on every day. If a dog is rewarded for doing the right thing after ALWAYS starting that sequence of behavior with a poor choice, you do see the problem here, right? Behavior chains can be lovely things but they can also be nightmares to behold. Modifying behavior successfully is always a matter of a bit of detective work in finding what works for THAT dog in THAT situation, without causing emotional or physical trauma on both sides of the equation. Properly done, time outs along *with* capturing appropriate choices, provide all of the relevant information to the dog so that forward movement can be obtained with minimum stress. Win/win.

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (2) →

And Then There Were None: Losing Trent, the Last of my Original Crew

And Then There Were None: Losing Trent, the Last of my Original Crew

No loss is easy, even as you anticipate its impending nearness. It’s still jarring and it rips an open wound into one’s soul. Even worse is a sudden change. There’s little time to prepare for the inevitable. The stark differences in every day life are there to remind you every second of how your life has changed so much.

Trent was my 14 year plus year-old Pit Bull mix, whom I had shared my life with since he was just over one year of age. He was my accidental dog. A former boss of mine came to me with the sad story of her granddaughter’s allergies to the puppy her son had for nearly 6 months. She loved this puppy, named Guido at the time, but her skin didn’t. I referred her to someone I thought that I knew well, who ran a rescue. She took Guido in and renamed him Tony. Tony was a lovely 6-month-old brindle Pit Bull with what was supposedly a sweet disposition.  I saw endless pictures of the 3-year-old child with her Guido. None were concerning.

Said “rescue” friend turned out to be in over her head and was basically warehousing dogs who were spending endless hours crated in their own feces. I was horrified. The shelter that I spent double digit years volunteering at sent their humane agents in and the dogs were seized. I asked to have Guido/Tony turned over to me, since I was responsible for sending him there. At the time, I ran a Doberman rescue, so I thought I would place him through said rescue. My dogs greeted him just fine. They were used to dogs rotating in and out our house. Kera especially seemed to enjoy playing with him, which wasn’t typical for her with new foster dogs. I renamed him Trent. Tony was not a suitable name for this sleek shiny boy. Trent bonded with Siri the most since, they were closest in age, for every day BFF status, but played well with all 3 of my personal dogs.

Trent_Blog_bodypic_20190102_141418As time went on, it appeared that Trent had some quirks, such as extreme leash reactivity towards other dogs. I assumed that it had developed in his time in “rescue”. I worked on this as much as possible, but it became clear that he was not going to be able to be placed in a normal dog parent home. I did not want to take the chance of a Pit Bull being in the news for the wrong reasons, so I committed to keeping him.

Trent actually did fine with other dogs off leash in my house. He just looked like a raging Tasmanian devil on a leash when another dog was in sight, even at a great distance. I had Doberman after Doberman rotate through my doors and Trent was great with all of them. He and Siri especially enjoyed when we dog sat for a brindle Great Dane puppy belonging to a friend. They looked like one dog with many limbs when they wrestled and rested.

Trent and I got along just fine. I loved him, and he loved me but we never shared the same bond as I did with Merlin, Kera and Siri. He sought affection from the dogs first, though I spent many hours laying on the couch with him and Siri wrapped as one, leaning on me. He was very social with any human who came to visit and changed a few minds on the subject of Pit Bulls. He was definitely a lover.

When Merlin was battling cancer, Trent watched over him with a keen eye, just like Siri did. Kera was starting to lose cognition so she was less aware, but Trent always made sure that Merlin was safe and nearby. He acted like a mother hen. I was very proud of him. We all mourned when Merlin passed but Trent wasn’t showing interest in eating dinner the next few days. I had to tell him that Merlin would want him to eat. He appeared to think about it and consented.

We lost Kera only 7 months later. It was just him and Siri for a bit and then Kenzo came into our lives like a lightening bolt of fur to shake us all up and add life again. Siri was afraid of the furry puppy that Kenzo was. She was still suffering all of our losses. But Trent rolled Kenzo on the floor every night for a week, eliciting puppy squeals until finally Siri decided to see what all the fuss was about. She never looked back. Trent gave her the courage to live and love again. They became the 3 musketeers. It was a joy to watch.

Trent got worried as Kenzo grew larger than he had likely ever seen a dog be. But Kenzo was (and is) a lover so he had nothing to fear. The one time that Kenzo decided to posture, at about 7 months of age, by standing over Trent, Siri immediately rose to the occasion with a big sister roar. Kenzo’s eye grew as large as the sun and he backed away to never try that nonsense again.

When Siri grew weary of life, Trent watched with concern. I think he suffered even more than I did when we lost her. They were 2 peas in a pod. For about 6 months, it was just my 2 boys. We had adventures such as a road trip to Maine where I discovered that Trent LOVED adventures. We went to Moraine State Park regularly so that my boys could hang out by the lake. And we hiked a lot in the local park. Finally, we added to the crew, a blond Chow Chow who was a stray who found herself at the local shelter, whom I named Mela. Neither boy welcomed her immediately, but Trent held his own and laid down his personal space rules and Mela respected them. The dynamics of this little family of mine were not the same as the previous fabulous foursome but we were happy.

During the past year Trent’s pace grew slower. His recognition of personal space declined. He was no longer able to jump up on the bed and refused to use the dog stairs. I put him on CBD oil for mobility purposes and he also grew a bit more alert for a little time. He still went on daily walks and mostly kept up and sniffed with the best of them. But in the last 6 months or so, he stopped coming upstairs to lay on the guest bed and instead chose the couch during waking hours. He stopped coming upstairs to see what Mela left in her snuffle mat when I got home from clients. He didn’t seem interested in our training games. He always ate well, and his housetraining remained 99% intact. So, it was easy pretend that he would last forever. After all, he turned 14 in August and although slower, he was still doing the important stuff as usual.

At his last vet visit in June, we decided to put him on Rimadyl. It was a great decision. He was clearly much spunkier and enjoying his walks even more than he already did. It made me happy. But I would be lying if I did not mention that his cognitive decline had made life much more annoying for all of us. The circumstance that decided that he would have to sleep in the “doggy condo corner” of my bedroom on the twin bed that was part of the dog beds there was because he had taken to stomping around the bed in the middle of the night and once jumped off of the bed in the dark onto Kenzo. Needless to say, that didn’t go well. He no longer recognized personal space boundaries and would walk straight at the other dogs when engaged in something that used to be obvious should not be interrupted such as a meal or pottying. His hearing was selective, and he tried to bite me frequently for trying to physically help guide him up the steps or onto the couch safely. He nearly walked straight out of my very high vehicle numerous times while I was trying to get the steps out, so I had to constantly make sure that he stayed in while I got them out. He would bound across the bedroom randomly when we first got up, straight into the other dogs with no recognition that this might not be a good idea. As with all seniors of any species, when he wanted something, he wanted it right then.

Because of this, I was more impatient with him than I should have been, more frequently than I was for his entire life until recently. I will likely be beating myself up about that forever. I tried very hard every day, but I wasn’t always successful at hiding that impatience. After all, I though he would live forever. I cannot even begin to describe the pain this brings my soul.

We had a lovely Thanksgiving Day. Trent managed to get his collar off again during our walk, which made that the second time in about a month. We walked in a local cemetery that day as we had the last time he lost it. But this time, the tags were not on as he had also managed to somehow loosen those in my house and I had them. My intent was to switch to his Christmas collar the day after Thanksgiving and add the tags then. But I never got the chance.

The day after Thanksgiving started like any other, aside from Trent seeming more wobbly than usual getting out for first potty. I noticed but not as much as I should have. Then when I went to bring him his breakfast, he wouldn’t get off of the couch and he was heavily panting and clearly in some kind of pain. I could not tell exactly from what, but it was a look that I recognized from the day that Siri passed, the end of life organ failure look. I was frantic. I needed him to eat in order to take his Rimadyl. I wanted to see if that helped but he would not swallow anything that I tried to give him. I called the vet. They said to bring him in in a couple of hours if he wasn’t better. He was a small amount better in that he could walk without falling but he was still panting and in pain. I made the decision to help him cross the bridge that day. I waited too long with Kera and I never forgave myself for that. With Siri, she passed on her own at home in my arms, but I still wonder if I should have given her peace from any suffering sooner. I didn’t want that to happen with Trent. I took him in and gave him some treats that he ate and held him sobbing my soul out while he crossed the bridge.

The next day, we went the same route on the walk that Trent had lost his collar, in a desperate search for it. I asked the universe and Trent to guide me to it. Halfway through I was starting to lose hope. Then we rounded the bend and it was there, laying in plain sight in the grass. I was so happy to have that collar back, it felt like Trent has made sure we would find it!

The losses never get easier. Despite my relationship with Trent not being the same as with my other original crew — Merlin, Kera and Siri — his loss left a huge hole in my heart. I cried for about 3 days straight, nearly non-stop. I am still mourning of course, Christmas without him was very hard. A few days after Trent crossed the bridge, first Mela on one day and then Kenzo, the following day, slept in the exact same spot on that twin bed in the doggy condo corner that Trent slept in. They have never done that before those instances and they have not repeated that since then. It felt like they were honoring him. They both stretched out in such a way that I don’t often see them do elsewhere. They both looked pleased. It was nice to see.

Part of my life is gone now and that makes me sad. I don’t know what the future holds but I like to think that every dog that I have shared my life with has taught me something about how to be a better person. I hope that the lessons that Trent left me with are more patience. I will do my best to honor him by cultivating that quality. Thank you, Trent, for sharing your life with me. I hope that someday I can be the person you wanted me to be. And I hope that you are free of pain with your “siblings” smiling in happiness.

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (6) →

Judgment Day: Elitism in the Dog World Helps No One

Judgment Day: Elitism in the Dog World Helps No One

We all judge others. It’s impossible to control our thoughts that much. Some judge silently, some judge out loud. Sometimes judgment is a necessity for the sake of the dog’s safety but most times, it’s simply a matter of opinion. In many cases, it is a matter of less knowledge. So while judging with regards to training methods is rampant, I will not be discussing that particular subject here. If you want more about that, read here. It’s an entire subject of it’s own.  Because science supports the efficacy of modern methods, it’s truly not worth our time to reinvent that wheel again.

Instead, I am going to cover some other facets of dog care and management such as feeding choices, harnesses, spaying and neutering, and a whole host of other subjects. I am sure that there are already eyes rolling so get comfortable. I am going try and cover my own pet peeves, as well as other’s whom I polled on this subject.

Harnesses: It is currently a thing among some people, whether they are trainers or savvy dog parents, to complain about other dog parents who are using front-clip harnesses because of all of the ‘damage’ that they can do to dogs structurally. This info is based on very limited studies and is mostly opinion on how they are used, with little attention paid to the real life needs of dog parents. It’s alarmist at best. Even the worst of the front-clip harnesses would need to be worn pretty much 24/7 to cause that kind of damage and that is simply not their typical use. I am not going to call out that harness by name, because it’s still helpful to plenty of dog parents. And it will ALWAYS be a better option than tension applied directly to a dog’s neck by a leash on a collar, ANY kind of collar, especially those of the punitive variety. The simple way to solve what is mainly fit problems, is to have these harnesses sold by dog professionals only. Harnesses like the Freedom harness  are not like all the other (potentially) more restrictive front-clip harnesses. Fitted properly, they not only provide control for the dog parents, so that they don’t face plant, but they miss restricting the shoulder blade area entirely. This seems to the primary complaint of the detractors. And quite frankly, I fit them a bit differently than the manufacturer suggests, creating an inverted V over the shoulders, so that there is no restriction, yet they retain their control for the handler. I LOVE these harnesses. They are a gift to the dog loving community. Now don’t get me wrong, the harnesses that the front-clip detractors  prefer are also great harnesses. They are well made and comfortable for the dog. However, they offer NO CONTROL for the dog parent. Here is a good article on that subject. Professionals telling a client to purchase these harnesses only are basically sending that dog parent right back to that prong collar that they previously relied upon. I know that, because I got that client after that happened. I’m sure that wasn’t the goal of the great trainer who suggested the harness. It certainly wasn’t helpful to the clients in question.   And of course, there will  be those who follow this paragraph with “well, just teach the dog how to walk nicely on a leash”. So now we get to the next subject….

Photo courtesy of Claire Staines

Photo courtesy of Claire Staines

Loose Leash Walking: It’s not easy nor is it quick to teach a dog this skill to the degree needed, for the typical dog parent who has other things going on in their life. For the dog savvy dog parents and dog pro crowd, yes, we get it and we know what is involved. But please understand that most people don’t want to have to be that knowledgeable about dog behavior and training in order to safely walk their dogs. Their goal is to not suffer any shoulder injuries and foremost, no face planting. We need to respect a dog parent’s goals. Failing to do so is what causes dogs to simply not get walked. Or even worse, they get walked on punitive devices that many of us would like to see disappear. If you are a dog professional getting paid to help a dog parent with their dog, cultivating empathy towards THEIR goals rather than your own ideals, is super important. Accept that there are plenty of dog parents who are happy to simply remain upright on a walk and have their dog occasionally acknowledge their existence whilst walking. It’s okay if this is their goal, really it is. I have personally solidly taught amazing loose leash walking skills to my previous crew of dogs but to only one of my current crew. The other two are mostly good in a group setting and great one on one and I am okay with that. It’s no one else’s’ job to care about that with my own dogs but mine.

Feeding: This is a category that EVERYONE has an opinion about. There are those who think that raw feeders are the devil as well as those who have that same opinion about dog parents who dare to feed kibble, and every category in between. Just stop. As quality dog behavior professionals and loving dog parents, it is important that we understand that nutrition *can* be related to behavior. If the food that a dog is getting fed is the bottom shelf nonsense that no dog should have to be subjected to, then by all means, a conversation can take place in order to educate on how to look for quality dog food ingredients. This can be followed by a polite suggestion to upgrade to the best quality food that someone can afford. But that is where it should end. A dog without behavior issues eating a medium quality kibble is not going to suffer dire consequences from such unless they happen to be allergic to an ingredient in said food. And if that is the case, it’s not anyone’s call to make other than the attending veterinarian. Refer them to quality MEDICAL sources so that they can help their dog but stop there. Nice dog behavior pros or savvy dog parents don’t bully others for feeding raw when they prefer home cooked or for feeding home cooked when they feed raw. And kibble is NOT the devil’s dog food, despite what several alarmist websites and books are trying to convince us of. There are literally hundreds of quality kibbles available out there. Most dog parents have a lot on their plate. They are not looking to spend hours on a weekly basis, home prepping food. Respect for them simply choosing to feed a quality kibble over a lower quality one is what we need to offer instead of a judgment on such. I personally feed a raw diet and have done so since 2001 but it rarely comes up unless someone specifically asks me. I certainly don’t preach this to clients as a must do. That would be unethical at best. The only area of feeding that warrants concern is when someone is forcing their own ethical choices on to their dog by insisting their carnivore eat vegan food. While still not our place to force a change, this does warrant some polite education information on the nutritional needs of dogs as well as respecting their nature and who they are.

Crates: The opinion on this subject ranges from one extreme (never crate your dog) to another (crates are required for all dogs). Neither is accurate. Plenty of dogs do just fine without crates. Some do better with crates when home alone. Some do better with restricted access to open areas without a crate. Some do better in one room with a gate and a dog proofed room. There is no one right way to do this. Some countries have laws with regards to how long a dog can be crated. That is a good thing, as some people who use crates absolutely do crate their dogs for longer than is appropriate. But that doesn’t mean using a crate is in of itself inappropriate. Puppies are kept infinitely safer because of crates. Many dogs in multiple dog households are kept from making poor choices when unsupervised because of crates. Some dogs are kept safer when traveling because of crates. Neither judging those who use them appropriately or those who don’t use them, because they are not needed for their situation, is helpful. I personally crate train all of my dogs because it’s a good skill for them to have if an emergency arises. But my dogs are transitioned out of crates when trustworthy. If the situation calls for it, they have different parts of the house, separated by gates when I am gone. Different strokes for different folks is not a bad thing!

Dog parents who work: Shocking, I know. But seriously, someone has to pay for that kibble and those toys. While I agree that there needs to be some attention paid to the dog after a day at work, don’t assume that people who work outside of the home aren’t doing this as a default. Dogs are not accessories and those that live with people who work normal workweeks very much anticipate their person’s arrival home. Their needs should be met as well as those of the person(s). Teaching dog parents how to meet those needs is far more important than judging them for not knowing that their dog needs enrichment as a part of their daily life. This is why so many doggy day care facilities exist. Some dogs do just fine at these establishments, especially when they are responsibly run. Doggy day cares as well as dog walkers are an important part of so many dog’s lives. Give kudos to those who utilize such options, as well as those who have relatives or friends who assist with mid-day potty breaks. There is no shame in being a working parent of any species.

Spaying and neutering: And here we have the dog world equivalent of conservatives versus liberals. Don’t be surprised at the vehemence of the discussion on this subject. I expect that this will be the hot button of even this entire hot button article. Lest I get too far and not make my own opinion on this subject known, I am all for altering. I support pediatric altering when needed, by rescues and shelters, though I certainly don’t prefer it. If the world was a perfect place for dogs and everyone in it took personal responsibility for the care and management and training of their animals, ideally altering would take place after the age of one year or even after growth plates close, which is somewhere after about 18 months of age for most dogs. But the world isn’t a perfect place and sadly, personal responsibility, especially in the United States, is at an all time low. We have many animals being euthanized daily for lack of appropriate homes. Let’s not place intact dogs into the hands of the general dog parenting public and expect them to make sure those dogs don’t reproduce until their ideal altering time arrives. That is folly at best. This creates more dogs that need homes. Additionally, dogs are often surrendered to shelters and rescues for behavioral reasons. Forcing dog parents to become behavior experts is not the best way to keep dogs out of shelters. And make no mistake, in THIS country, responsibility lacking, no typical dog parent wants to learn, for example, how neutered males can seem to feel threatened by an intact male and act like a bully towards them. You can read more about that here. Repetition of that will create a defensive response in said intact male. That’s a nice recipe for impending dog reactivity, all because of a lack of understanding on the intricacies of dog behavior. It’s typically not the fault of the intact male but that doesn’t change the fact that MOST dogs in this country are indeed already altered. What is the alternative? One can move to Europe, where responsibility is more typical overall. But that seems a bit extreme, right? The other part of the spaying/neutering argument is that dogs are imminently healthier when kept intact.  This compilation of multiple studies seems to say otherwise. What does seem most probable is that altering after the age of one is best for large and giant breeds as well as for *possibly* preventing *some* issues but again, weak info. That said, there are thousands of dogs that fit outside of those perimeters who live long and healthy lives having been altered prior to that age. Here is my favorite part of the article linked to above.

Photo Courtesy Christine Collins

“Unfortunately, there is no clear answer when deciding whether one should spay or neuter an individual dog. While there is minimal to no strong evidence clearly linking gonadectomy to various diseases, owners of at-risk breeds should consider all factors. Given the potential for an increased lifespan, many owners may wish to accept the potential for cancers often associated with geriatric age to avoid nuisance behaviors associated with an intact animal and diseases such as pyometra or BPH.

Evidence for a link between gonadectomy and increased risk of the neoplastic, behavioral, immunologic, or orthopedic diseases mentioned in this article is weak and needs to be further explored with appropriately designed research studies. These risks may also be breed specific. The decision to spay or neuter a pet should be an individual one with a thorough discussion between the owner and the veterinarian about what risks are present and how they may affect the particular patient.”

Dogs and kids: There are some trainers as well as rescue and shelter workers who believe that kids and dogs should never mix. Nonsense! How does one become acquainted with caring properly for a dog if one is denied that opportunity just because one is a child? There are parents who properly manage kids and dogs together and there are parents who don’t. Don’t penalize the former because of the latter. It can be done and it can be done well. Parents who manage and educate both sides of the species equation do it best. Advocate for them instead of discriminating.

Dog doors: This is a mixed subject. They can be wonderful and they can be horrible. Every situation is individual. It’s important to take into consideration the individual dynamics of the household, the environment surrounding the home, the yard itself and the temperament(s) of the dog(s) in question. It’s also important to understand how the dog door is being used, such as it is locked at night, when home alone, etc. There is no need to judge a situation that you don’t have all of the facts about. Generalizations on any subject are rarely accurate.

Invisible Fences: This one is likely to get me ostracized by many other modern methodology trainers but I am saying it anyway. I don’t advise all of my clients to stop using an electronic fencing system. I don’t prefer them but I definitely think that they can be used ether irresponsibly or responsibly and many ranges in between. When used as a back up with a barrier fence for diggers, this is never going to be a situation that I object to. Immediately judging a client who has one, just for having one, shuts down communication. That means that you can no longer educate on the responsible use of such, which would be much more helpful to the dog in question. I won’t help clients perimeter train a “fence” like this but I will make suggestions on a more humane use of them, as well as to tell them when they are getting inaccurate and/or potentially harmful information from their electronic fence “trainer”, which could then place their dog either at physical or emotional risk or both. With the right environmental set up such as in a rural or semi-rural area, with a natural landscaping perimeter, they can be used quite responsibly. On the corner of a busy suburban street plan or worse, in a town-home type community, they are usually a nightmare.  Supervision is also a key component to using these responsibly. The temperament of the dog in question also plays part. Stop judging and start educating instead.

Car travel: This one can also rile up the masses! The stories of ill fated car trips abound for both sides of this equation. Crates in cars can harm the dog! Not crating dogs in cars can harm the dog! What’s a giant dog dog parent to do when they would have to buy an RV to safely and spatially crate their dogs? My dogs span the range of sizes from 185#, 63#, to 44#. In my current vehicle, I could fit a crate for the two smaller dogs. That’s it. I could never fit a crate that would be large enough for my 185# dog. Am I supposed to never travel with him? What are the alternatives? Don’t get a giant breed? That’s rather a harsh option, I think. After all, I have already based the size of my vehicle on whether it fits all of my dogs comfortably. I am not ready to drive an RV just yet.  My solution has and always will be, to secure them with a leash attached to back of their their front clip harness and one of the handy straps inside that allow one to haul themselves into an SUV more easily. Should I do this with each trip? Probably but it seems excessive for the ¼ of a mile trip to one walking location and the ½ a mile trip to another walking location, when the fastest anyone could drive on those trips is 25 miles an hour. So I save that for longer trips. My dogs are relaxed in my vehicle. They are primarily in the back of my SUV and never interfere with my driving.  Just like anyone else, I object when I see dogs on the laps of drivers. That is unsafe for everyone. But as long as your dog is secured in your vehicle and not interfering with your driving process, then that should allow you to be safe from other’s perceptions of what is best, but sadly, that isn’t the case.

I am sure that I am missing someone’s pet peeve but this could be an entire book if I kept going. The moral of the story is to determine whether the situation is life or death. Then live and let live. No judgment, no finger pointing and no admonitions. If you are a dog professional, your obligation goes even deeper. Respect your client’s goals rather than pushing your own goals onto them. It is not the end of the world as we know it if a dog is walked daily on a front clip harness, I can assure you. The dog will be happy for the walk. Take a deep breathe and let it go.

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (7) →

False Positive: Why Certification Isn’t Enough in Dog Training

False Positive: Why Certification Isn’t Enough in Dog Training

The array of choices for choosing a dog trainer out there is staggering.  Some trainers espouse one end of the training methodology spectrum, while others embrace the opposing philosophy. Without hours upon hours of research on the subject, at a superficial glance, there is just no good way for a dog parent to know who they should hire.

Choosing someone with a certification would seem the way to go, but wait, is the playing field level when the word certification is used by someone as their claim to a credential? Not even close! Certifying bodies (or individuals!) are all different and have widely ranging criteria. Add to that, the fact that literally anyone can say that they are certifying people as dog trainers and it is perfectly legal to do this. The word certified has been rendered meaningless in this field. With no single oversight organization regulating the body of knowledge required by dog trainers at any level, there is simply no way of knowing what each certification is required to achieve, if anything at all.

Don’t get me wrong. I strongly believe that those who want to be considered professionals in this field should make an effort to gain some baseline certification by a *respected* organization that has some minimum guidelines and a decent code of ethics. But many current certifications are just a baseline, not an end goal. Additionally, most quality professional organizations in this field prefer to remain open to all ends of the methodology spectrum in order to have a better chance educating the masses. You cannot educate properly if you judge too harshly and exclude those who may learn to move forward with their knowledge. I get that and I wholeheartedly agree with it. Change comes from within and without being judged. I started out as a traditional trainer. Without access to the APDT and their vast knowledge, I would not be where I am today. So while someone who has a reasonably well respected baseline certification has the knowledge that such a certification requires, that does not means all of those with that particular certification choose to utilize the same methodology or are at the same current level of knowledge. Confused yet?

Regulation is what this field desperately needs. I know that many of my colleagues are worried about this while many others support it. I am on the side of support. I firmly believe that science always wins so having the American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior in charge of various levels of licensing is a no brainer for what I hope will be well regulated licensing for dog trainers and behavior consultants some day. After all, who gets to decide the various levels of knowledge required in other licensed fields? The experts! So why would anyone fear that those without top level educational credentials would get a crack at this? It would be highly unethical and ill advised to do otherwise.

Jobs that require testing -- not dog training. Graphic courtesy Jim Fox.

Jobs that require testing — not dog training. Graphic courtesy Jim Fox.

Currently the only country to legislate dog training is Germany. They overwhelmingly require modern methods be used. There are testing requirements and licensing requirements for dog trainers. There are also testing requirements for dog PARENTS! I consider this a wonderful thing. The trainer requirements seem to vary a bit by district but what is all encompassing is that the country’s humane laws state that one cannot cause pain to a dog in order to train them. That fact does more to level the playing field in Germany than any “certification” in the USA that is currently available will ever do. One can purchase a prong, choke or shock collar in Germany but one cannot use them on one’s dog. There was a recent case where a couple was found guilty of cruelty because they did use a shock collar on their dog. I wish that would happen in the US soon! You can read more about the humane laws in this translated to English article from a few years ago. German humane laws.

Hillsborough County, in Florida has fairly recently passed some legislation that requires training plan transparency from dog trainers prior to being hired. They also must be licensed by the county. There are no restrictions on methods used but several people whose dogs have been injured by “trainers” using old fashioned methods during board and train decided enough was enough. They wanted there to be more information up front of what exactly might be done to their dog in the name of training. They felt that they could make better informed decisions on who to hire. I agree. A few local trainers who use modern methods joined their efforts. This is a good start. So many people just don’t realize what actually transpires during most board and trains. The quantity of professionals who utilize modern rewards-based methods with a board and train is low, unfortunately. So while methods are not restricted in any way, transparency of what a trainer might include in a training plan for a behavior that they are being hired to fix IS required. I would prefer that they not call it a training plan, as that would be unethical to offer prior to meeting a dog. But I am assured by those involved that it simply means what *might* be used to fix the behavior in question. Read about that here. Hillsborough County Florida Dog Training Transparency Law

Until there is regulation in this industry, how do you, as a dog parent, decide who does have the knowledge and certification that you are looking for, in order to spend both your money and your time wisely? Well, I will make a concentrated attempt to help you understand what all of the most well known “certifications” mean, as well as what you should view as a red flag. Grab a seat and a beverage as this won’t be a short article.

 

**Disclaimer: this article is about US based organizations only. Many of these groups are international but in some cases, the requirements are different in other countries. APDT is a good example of this. I am discussing US based membership requirements only here. **

APDT: The Association of Professional Dog Trainers or APDT for short, is not a certifying agency. Placing the initials APDT after your name will actually get you into trouble with the organization, as they don’t appreciate being misrepresented. If you pay your dues and click a box to be listed in the directory, then you are listed. It’s that simple.  Qualified trainers as well as those who simply paid a fee to join or even those who paid a larger fee to have their listing highlighted, are all in the same listing. Larger fees get you listed first. Certifications that they recognize get you listed AND coming up in the certified only listing if the person searching chooses that option. Being listed does not imply one is qualified OR uses modern methods. The APDT offers a nice disclaimer stating just that. Reading the fine print will always be important.

UPDATE: APDT, CCPDT and IAABC have joined forces to create their shared Code of Ethics.

CCPDT: The Certification Council of Professional Dog Trainers is a certifying organization that originally was created by the APDT. They have been a separate organization for quite some time now. They offer several levels of certification, the most widely known is the CPDT-KA or Certified Professional Dog Trainer-Knowledge Assessed. This is a basic knowledge test that is a good starting point for those in the field. I like to think of it as an Associate Degree for dog trainers. Passing this written test means that the trainer in question has some book knowledge on varying subjects.  There are requirements for client/class hours but they are minimal. There is also no real way to validate the submitted hours or what they actually apply to. Certified members are not required to adhere to a particular methodology, though there is a suggested code of ethics.  As far as application of the book knowledge, there is no real way to determine that aside from thorough reading of the website for the trainer and/or asking for references. That said, it’s a good start. But again, read the fine print.

Another certification offered by this organization is more the advanced, CPDT-KSA, which stands for Certified Professional Dog Trainer-Knowledge Skills Assessed. This certification goes beyond a written test and requires video submissions. This is definitely a more thorough certification that just the KA.

Finally, the CCPDT also offers the CBCC-KA certification. This written test is more geared towards behavior modification rather than training. So this test is more intensive. Again, better than baseline is always going to be a good thing!

UPDATE: APDT, CCPDT and IAABC have joined forces to create their shared Code of Ethics.

IAABC: The International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants.  This organization focuses more on behavior than strictly training manners. They also do not limit themselves to dogs. One can get certified in dog behavior, cat behavior, equine behavior, bird behavior and shelter animal behavior as well as service animals. The certification process is not easy and one should be proud of achieving the various certification options. I cannot say enough good things about this organization. The primary dog behavior certification is a CDBC, also known as a Certified Dog Behavior Consultant. This is the certification that I possess. One can also have an Associate Certification, which means that you are on the path to being certified. There is also an option to be a supporting member. This organization is meant to be an open educational organization so there are no limits to methodology. The organization does have a LIMA ethic, which means Least Intrusive, Minimally Aversive. This can be interpreted subjectively by some people. So again, research is your friend when choosing a consultant. I do consider this organization one of the highest quality organizations in existence in this field, with a strong emphasis on continuing education. This listing is my go to for finding a quality consultant for someone in need, outside of my area.

UPDATE: APDT, CCPDT and IAABC have joined forces to create their shared Code of Ethics.

PPG: The Pet Professional Guild. This is the only organization that requires the use of modern methodology in order to become a member. One needs to have a reference from an existing member to join. While requiring this might seem like a good thing to many, the simple fact that one uses modern methodology only does not indicate the quality of education that one possesses. They now offer 3 levels of certification. Some require video submissions. Unfortunately, I could not get enough information on the actual testing to offer an educated opinion. All I know is that at least one test is multiple choice, which is not my favorite testing method. Read more about PPG credentialing.

 

Online training schools: ABC (Animal Behavior College), Catch Canine Academy, Karen Pryer Academy, The Academy for Dog Trainers are the primary ones out there. ABC is mixed methods and no requirement for continuing education nor so proper code of ethics as far as conduct and methods used after graduation. Catch is modern methods and various levels of progression. From personal experience, I would far rather have a Catch student doing an externship than an ABC student. The quality of education is much better. That said, this is just a beginning point, not an ending point and the next step should be working for/with an experienced trainer and learning more before offering assistance to dog parents with just this “credential”. KPA and The Academy are more involved programs that offer much more intensive in person learning opportunities.  KPA requires graduates to maintain CEU’s in order to keep their title. There are other training academies for those who wish to utilize more old-fashioned methods. They won’t be listed here so if you don’t recognize the name as one of these, skip their graduates for best results.

Mostly in person academies include Pat Miller’s (PMCT) and the Victoria Stilwell academy. Both are quality programs. Pat Miller’s certification has several levels that are very intensive and in person. VS Academy has a couple of levels in person as well as the in-between portions where the student works with their mentor hands on. VS graduates are just that, graduates. No certification is involved, which I love. All levels of knowledge go through this program. Pat Miller’s has certifications with stringent testing requirements. Victoria Stilwell also offers the VSPT designation that allows modern methodology trainers to use those initials after an extensive interviews, video submissions, and references with a minimum of 2 years of professional training under their belts. All three of these mentioned are quality options.

PetsMart, Petco, Camp Bow Wow all say that their trainers are certified (or in PetSmart’s case, accredited, a vastly inappropriate term more typical for museums and universities and not even close to the proper meaning of here see definition ). They all are, but internally by their own program. They all say that they utilize positive reinforcement but that phrase means different things to different people. For example, at least some Camp Bow Wows uses spray water bottles in baby puppy classes to “discipline” puppies. Not necessary and not positive at all! As of the time of this writing, PetsMart has a 2-week, 80 hour course and Petco has a 6-week course that became more intensive about a year ago and is in progress to further develop even more rigid requirements. They also appreciate being told about any store not adhering to their corporate standards and will immediately address it with the store in question. This is a good start for consumers who take Petco classes. But be mindful that your trainer could have been a cashier at the grocery store before that 2 to 6 week course. This is definitely not enough education to teach people how to train their dogs. That said, there are plenty of trainers who do continuing education on their own, and/or who opt to work for these companies to get to do the job that they love, while also having steady employment. Those trainers will advertise that fact. This is a good thing. Again, research and trust your instincts.

The only real certifications are Veterinary Behaviorists and Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists. These are board certified individuals with a doctorate level degree.

Then we have the really scary ones. There are dozens of individual certifications by people calling themselves qualified to offer such to anyone willing to pay the cost of a 6 week or so course either in person or online and “achieving” the title of “master trainer” or something similar, many of them franchises that require little or no dog training knowledge to start with. As a general rule, avoid any franchise that offers a guarantee. It is impossible to guarantee the future behavior of a sentient being. It’s a huge red flag when someone says that is possible. Also avoid corporate type “trainers” that operate under the umbrella of another “trainer” with an 800 number that then goes to whoever is their rep in the area. Again, this will always be a traditional methods based “trainer”.

That covers most of the letters or phrases that you might see in relation to so called certification. It’s just too confusing for the general dog parenting public. No one should have to become a dog trainer in order to understand who is safe to hire for assistance with their dog. This is clearly why overall regulation is the way to go, with the veterinary behaviorists at the helm. It is the only logical way to proceed as well as how all other vocations that need regulation proceed.

In addition to regulating trainers themselves to identify varying levels of expertise, we really need to start with regulating the meaning of the words so that it doesn’t take detective work to determine how the person using said word defines it. For example, it used to be simple. We just identified ourselves as positive trainers and that was that. Not so much anymore. Now anyone that uses any kind of kindness, whether it’s simply a matter of saying good boy even once, states that they use positive reinforcement. Then the modern trainers decided to call themselves force-free. Now the trainers who use old fashioned methods are trademarking this moniker and stating that using a shock collar (that they call “just a tap” or “based on tens unit technology”) or intimidation to “train” is force-free. Despite the true definition of the phrase, the dog training consumer cannot even trust words anymore. I have taken to calling myself a modern methodology trainer who uses mark and rewards-based methods without pain or intimidation. That is quite a mouthful but what else is left when words that should imply safety for your dog are high-jacked by those who are intent on luring you in with falsehoods?!

More red flag words/phrases include: pack leader, alpha, dominance, pack walk, control, balanced, correction, e-collar, vibration collar, stim collar, and to lesser degrees, leadership, commands and obedience. Most modern trainers know better than to use the word leadership on their websites as that word has been so misused by old fashioned “trainers”. There are plenty of modern trainers who still use the word obedience, and to a lesser degree, commands, so that one requires a closer look at the rest of a trainer’s website. But I yearn for the day when the word “leadership” means the same thing as a quality parent and the word “obedience” is never mentioned about a dog again. Words are important! Read about that here Outdated Dog Training Terms

 

Make no mistake. All dogs can have their training and behavior modification plans succeed using modern methods. There is never going to be a need to utilize old fashioned methods or outdated tools in order to achieve your goals for your dog. Dog parents should not have to fear for their dog’s safety with someone they hire to help their dog. It’s time that we bring this profession into modern times and level the playing field. Dogs deserve it as do their loving guardians. Be your dog’s voice. Demand quality education and modern methods for those who work with dog behavior.

Posted in: Projects

Leave a Comment (39) →
Page 2 of 12 12345...»